Wednesday 

Room 5 

13:40 - 14:40 

(UTC+02

Talk (60 min)

Non-Blocking Continuous Code Reviews, a Case Study

The problem with the current most commonly accepted way of running code reviews using Pull Requests is that they have the nasty habit of blocking the flow of delivery. They introduce a cost of delay. Any delay reduces feedback. Consequently, it drives down quality. The usual way to achieve fast, efficient and effective Continuous Code Reviews without disrupting the flow of delivery is through Pair Programming or Team Programming. However, for various valid reasons, these can be a cultural stretch for many teams and organisations. In 2012, a novice team practising trunk-based development set in place a fairly uncommon but efficient alternative to implementing continuous code reviews on mainline without ever blocking the flow of delivery. This team went from a bunch of rag-tags to becoming a reference team within the organisation, with auditors falling to the floor due to the high quality the team delivered.

Thierry de Pauw

Thierry founded ThinkingLabs, an advisory firm to help optimise IT delivery to reduce stress and fatigue for teams.

From time to time they are asked to conduct technology due diligence for investors to review the technology capabilities of organisations.

Thierry is a CI/CD advocate and jack-of-all-trades. Instead of balancing quality & delivery, they believe and practice that better quality is actually a way to more and better deliveries.